April 12, 2021
The apex court pronounced its crucial order regarding
SC also appointed Fali Nariman & senior SC lawyer Gopal Subramanium as
Amicus Curiae to find out who would be the BCCI officials.In reply, the Amicus
Curiae revealed that the BCCI chief, in his affidavit submitted to the top
court, had said that he sought Shashank Manohars opinion as the BCCI chairman,
which was denied by the latter saying that it was asked in the ICC meeting.The
three-member apex court-bench, headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur, also asked the
countrys cricket board to suggest if there is any name for post of administrator
and also granted them one-week time for the same. The next date of hearing in
the matter is January 19th.SC said as per July 18, 2016 order, Thakur and Shirke
did not comply with its order and thereby been removed.SC said as per July 18,
2016 order, Thakur and Shirke did not comply with its order and thereby been
removed.Meanwhile, the top court also reserved order on replacing BCCI top brass
with a panel of administrators.SC also said that the BCCI and state board
officials failed to implement its orders to bring transparency and
accountability in cricket body.
The recommendations, which have still not been
accepted by the 30-member committee, include one-state one-vote, age limit of 70
years, cooling-off period of three years which included the tenure of the
administrators, continue with the five-selectors and retaining the powers of the
president and secretary as per the earlier constitution of the board. Din975 SC
also said that the BCCI and state board officials failed to implement its orders
to bring transparency and accountability in cricket body.On October 1, the board
had accepted many of the "significant recommendations" of the Lodha Committee,
but excluded the important ones which have been a bone of contention between the
cricket body and the Lodha Panel.The apex court, which was hearing the Lodha
panels third status report that asked for the removal of top brass of the BCCI,
also asked the Amicus Curiae whether Thakur committed perjury or not in the
case.
The apex court pronounced its crucial order regarding Justice (Retired) RM
Lodha-led committees recommendations and the BCCIs constant reluctance to accept
them.On December 15 last year, the top court had observed Thakur prima facie
appears to have committed matter of perjury in relation to demanding an
intervention via a letter from the International Cricket Council (ICC) in order
to sidestep the implementation of the Lodha committee recommendations.It should
be noted that if Thakur is found to have committed perjury then he might land in
jail.SC, which was hearing perjury charges levelled against Thakur by Amicus
Curiae Gopal Subramaniam, asked, "Why prosecution should not be initiated
against him"? and also sought a reply from Thakur in this regard. The apex court
also removed BCCI secretary Ajay Shirke from his post.
Posted by: chinathrei at
01:37 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 476 words, total size 3 kb.
11kb generated in CPU 0.007, elapsed 0.023 seconds.
33 queries taking 0.0183 seconds, 45 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
33 queries taking 0.0183 seconds, 45 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.